Cases 1 - 10 of 2,751
Leib-Podry v. Tobias
as 24-1248
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP LEIB-PODRY
Defendant:
GEOFFREY TOBIAS, PRINCETON INSURANCE COMPANY, MEDPRO GROUP and others
Lewis v. Payroll Systems, Inc.
as 24-1256
Plaintiff:
SCOTT PHILLIP LEWIS
Defendant:
PAYROLL SYSTEMS, INC., JOSEPH POMPO and KENNETH CARDARELLI
Stone v. Exos Human Capital, LLC
as 1:2024cv03548
Plaintiff:
Phillip Stone
Defendant:
Exos Human Capital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Madelaine Chocolate Novelties, Inc. v. Lewis
as 1:2024cv03284
Plaintiff:
Madelaine Chocolate Novelties, Inc.
Defendant:
Phillip Lewis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Brown v. Suffolk County Police Department
as 24-1175
Plaintiff:
ADRIENNE BROWN, HENRY MULLIGAN, (incarcerated) and CHRISPHER BRANDL
Defendant:
SUFFOLK COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, "OFFICERS & SGT. "ETC", PHILLIPS OSTEN, Officer and others
Maughn v. MLJ Painting Corp.
as 1:2024cv03222
Plaintiff:
Phillip Maughn
Defendant:
MLJ Painting Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Paige v. Digital Business Networks Alliance, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv03169
Defendant:
DIGITAL BUSINESS NETWORKS ALLIANCE, LLC, OFS PORTAL, LLC, MCGINNIS LOCHRIDGE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHELE PAIGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Phillips v. Caring et al
as 1:2024cv03006
Plaintiff:
Beatriz Phillips
Defendant:
ELARA CARING, ANANTH MOHAN and SCOTT POWERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Lewis v. Town of Elizabethtown
as 8:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Scott Phillip Lewis
Defendant:
Town of Elizabethtown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
