Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Reginald Dunahue v. Kennie Bolden, et al
as 17-3300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Reginald L. Dunahue
Defendant - Appellee:
Kennie Bolden, Chief of Security, Varner Max, Mark Stephens, Captain, Varner Max, Sedrick Foote, Sergeant, Varner Max and others
Rocky Huddleston v. Jeremy Andrews, et al
as 16-1946
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rocky Huddleston
Defendant:
Phillip Esaw, Lieutenant, ADC, L. Malone, Major, Varner Unit, Moses Jackson, Assistant Warden, Varner Unit and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeremy Andrews, Assistant Warden, Varner Unit, Randy Watson, Warden, Varner Unit, Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Reginald Dunahue v. Randy Watson, et al
as 16-1606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Reginald L. Dunahue
Defendant - Appellee:
Randy Watson, Warden, Varner Max, Mark Stephens, Captain, Varner Max, Kennie Bolden, Chief of Security, Varner Max and others
Huddleston v. Esaw et al
as 5:2016cv00059
Plaintiff:
Rocky Huddleston
Defendant:
Phillip Esaw, Inman, Pascal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peoples v. Esaw et al
as 5:2016cv00009
Plaintiff:
Travon Peoples
Defendant:
Phillip Esaw and J Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunahue v. Watson et al
as 5:2015cv00382
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lamont Dunahue
Defendant:
Randy Watson, Mark Stephens, Kennie Bolden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deverick Scott v. Randy Watson, et al
as 15-2497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Deverick Scott
Defendant - Appellee:
Randy Watson, Warden, Varner Unit, Moses Jackson, Assistant Warden, Varner Unit, Malone, Major, Varner Unit and others
Scott v. Watson et al
as 5:2015cv00194
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Randy Watson, Moses Jackson, Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Watson et al
as 5:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Randy Watson, Moses Jackson, Michael Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
