Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Rivera et al v. Washington State Building Code Council
as 1:2023cv03070
Plaintiff:
Jamon Rivera, Inland NW AGC, Spokane Home Builders Association and others
Defendant:
Washington State Building Code Council, Climate Solutions, The Lands Council and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ev Fed. Question: Environment
Columbia Riverkeeper et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2019cv06071
Plaintiff:
Columbia Riverkeeper, Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers and National Marine Fisheries Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Resolute Forest Products, Inc. et al v. Greenpeace International et al
as 4:2017cv02824
Plaintiff:
Resolute Forest Products, Inc. , Resolute FP US, Inc. , Resolute FP Augusta, LLC and others
Defendant:
Greenpeace International , Greenpeace, Inc. , Greenpeace Fund, Inc. and others
Movant:
The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 11 additional media organizations
Amicu:
Alaska Wilderness League , Center for Biological Diversity , Center for international Environmental Law and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Rod Runyon, et al
as 17-35207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROD RUNYON, Commission Chair of the Wasco County Board of Commissioners, STEVE KRAMER, County Commissioner of the Wasco County Board of County Commissioners, SCOTT HEGE, County Commissioner of the Wasco County Board of County Commissioners and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE, INC., COLUMBIA RIVERKEEPER and OREGON PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Movant:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE UMATILLA INDIAN RESERVATION, THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE WARM SPRINGS RESERVATION OF OREGON and CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Runyon et al
as 3:2017cv00038
Defendant:
Gorham Blaine, Bowen Blair, Angie Brewer and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Columbia Riverkeeper, Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. and Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility
Movant:
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation and The Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Center for Environmental Health et al v. McCarthy et al
as 3:2015cv02939
Plaintiff:
Center for Environmental Health , Beyond Pesticides and Physicians for Social Responsibility
Defendant:
Gina McCarthy and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Sierra Club et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 2:2015cv03798
Defendant:
Jared Blumenfeld, Gina McCarthy and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff:
Physicians for Social Responsibility - Los Angeles and Sierra Club
Rep. of the Marshall Islands v. USA, et al
as 15-15636
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS, a non-nuclear-weapon State party to the Treaty on the Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BARACK OBAMA, The President of the United States of America, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Amicus Curiae:
HANS KRISTENSEN, ROBERT ALVAREZ, JAMES DOYLE and others
Sierra Club, et al -v- United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al
as 3:2014cv04596
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club , Center For Biological Diversity , WildEarth Guardians and others
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency , Gina McCarthy and Jared Blumenfeld
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
Center for Environmental Health et al v. McCarthy
as 4:2014cv01013
Plaintiff:
Center for Environmental Health , Beyond Pesticides and Physicians for Social Responsibility
Defendant:
Gina McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
