Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Brandon Pickens v. Todd Ishee
as 24-6439
Petitioner:
BRANDON MICHAEL PICKENS
Respondent:
TODD E. ISHEE, Secretary of North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections
Brandon Pickens v. Todd Ishee
as 24-6371
Petitioner:
BRANDON MICHAEL PICKENS
Respondent:
TODD E. ISHEE, Secretary of North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections
Brandon Pickens v. Todd Ishee
as 24-6330
Petitioner:
BRANDON MICHAEL PICKENS
Respondent:
TODD E. ISHEE, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Adult Correction
Pickens v. Ishee
as 5:2023hc02269
Petitioner:
Brandon Michael Pickens
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bey v. Pickens et al
as 8:2023cv05593
Petitioner:
Malcolm Bey and Malcolm Rawlinson Bey
Respondent:
Jeremy Pickens, Isaac K Fekete and Warden of the Anderson County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pickens v. N.C. Department of Adult Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
Brandon Pickens
Defendant:
N.C. Department of Adult Corrections and Various Staff Members of the North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. Ishee
as 1:2023cv00285
Petitioner:
Brandon Pickens
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Byrd v. Cisco et al
as 8:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Ivey Nicole Byrd
Defendant:
Lt Cisco, Sgt Capps, Judge Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Burrell v. Addison-Brown et al
as 5:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dewayne Burrell
Defendant:
Cpl K Addison-Brown and Pickens County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
