Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Dennis Smith, Jr. v. Sgt. Rogers
as 24-6324
Plaintiff:
DENNIS KEITH SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
SERGEANT ROGERS, Hampton Roads Regional Jail, LT. JONES, Hampton Roads Regional Jail, COL. J. VERGAKIS, Hampton Roads Regional Jail and others
Joel Burrell v. K. Topham
as 22-6591
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOEL AARON BURRELL
Defendant / Appellee:
K. TOPHAM, RN, P. WESTBROOK-SCOTT, Health Service Administrator, DOCTOR PATEL and others
Rucker v. Piedmont Regional Jail Authority et al
as 3:2021cv00412
Defendant:
Piedmont Regional Jail Authority and James Davis
Plaintiff:
George Rucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kristopher Daniels v. Raymond Streat
as 21-6905
Defendant / Appellee:
RAYMOND DALE STREAT, Piedmont Regional Jail
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KRISTOPHER OWEN DANIELS
Moore v. Piedmont Regional Jail
as 1:2021cv00621
Defendant:
Piedmont Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves v. Wellpath et al
as 2:2021cv00278
Defendant:
Wellpath and Piedmont Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
Shaun Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v Piedmont Regional Jail
as 1:2021cv00464
Petitioner:
Johnnie Lee Conner
Defendant:
Piedmont Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutland v. Piedmont Regional Jail et al
as 5:2020cv00241
Plaintiff:
James Earl Rutland, III
Defendant:
Gilmer FCI, Piedmont Regional Jail and Grady County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cory Jacobs v. U.S. Marshals Service
as 20-7032
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, Three Unknown Named Deputies, PIEDMONT REGIONAL JAIL, Unknown Name and Number of Staff and Warden, WELL PATH MEDICAL SERVICES OF PIEDMONT REGIONAL JAIL, and Unknown Name Supervisor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORY LEE JACOBS
Xavier Earquhart v. United States Marshals EDNC
as 20-6936
Petitioner / Appellant:
XAVIER MILTON EARQUHART
Respondent / Appellee:
PIEDMONT REGIONAL JAIL and UNITED STATES MARSHAL EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
