Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Salas v. St. Pierre
as 2:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Julian Salas
Defendant:
Diane L. St. Pierre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Hamilton v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2024cv03037
Plaintiff:
Pierre Quaran Hamilton
Defendant:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01740
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Watson v. Starr
as 1:2023cv01219
Petitioner:
Pierre Watson
Respondent:
M. Starr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carlisle v. Centennial Resource Development, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02007
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
Centennial Resource Development, Inc., Steven J. Shapiro, Maire A. Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Pierre v. Community Alternatives of El Paso County et al
as 1:2022cv01072
Plaintiff:
Randall D. St. Pierre
Defendant:
Community Alternatives of El Paso County, Long, Barlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Lankford et al
as 5:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Biglauwick Plaisimond, Manetirony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
James Lankford, Jim Inhofe, Stephanie Bice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melnick v. Polis et al
as 1:2021cv03316
Plaintiff:
Hunter Adam Melnick
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Jared (I) Polis, Dean Willams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clervrain et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2021cv00326
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, John M. O'Connor, Paul B. Hunker, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
