Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Delmas Edwards, Jr. v. Caitlyn Bazerghi
as 24-1204
Plaintiff:
DELMAS PIERRE EDWARDS, JR.
Defendant:
CAITLYN BAZERGHI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Edwards v. Bazerghi
as 4:2023cv11704
Plaintiff:
Delmas Pierre Edwards, Jr.
Defendant:
Caitlyn Bazerghi
Edwards v. Genisys Credit Union
as 2:2023cv11706
Plaintiff:
Delmas Pierre Edwards, Jr.
Defendant:
Genisys Credit Union
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brown v. O'Connor et al
as 1:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Terry Brown
Defendant:
Maureen O'Connor, Judge Marilyn Zayas, Judge Beth Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Karla Howell v. NaphCare, Inc., et al
as 22-3306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KARLA HOWELL, as Administratrix of the Estate of Cornelius Pierre Howell
Defendant / Appellee:
NAPHCARE, INC., CHRISTINA JORDAN, PIERETTE ARTHUR, Individually and in her Official Capacity and others
Defendant:
BRAD BUCHANAN
Clervrain et al v. Golden et al
as 3:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ashly Carmelle Dorsainville, Fridelyne Maisoneuve and others
Defendant:
Scott Golden, Jennifer Little, Pat Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Clervrain et al v. Madden et al
as 5:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ronaldo Jean, Brandko, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Madden, Jon Husted, Dave Yost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
