Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Pierre v. Woods (INMATE3)
as 2:2018cv00182
Plaintiff:
Mackenson Pierre
Defendant:
Walter Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Gordy et al
as 5:2017cv01903
Petitioner:
Marcus Pierre Jackson
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy and Alabama Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Turner v. United States Marine Corps
as 1:2015cv00666
Plaintiff:
Ryan Pierre Turner
Defendant:
United States Marine Corps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Moss et al v. Brown et al
as 2:2015cv02132
Plaintiff:
James Wesley Moss and Florida Pharmacy Solutions Inc
Defendant:
James R Brown , Janice Brown , Pierre Rodrique Joncas and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Jackson v. State of Alabama
as 5:2014cv02073
Petitioner:
Marcus Pierre Jackson
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Steadfast Insurance Company v. Security Engineers Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01124
Plaintiff:
Steadfast Insurance Company
Defendant:
Security Engineers Inc, InTown Suites Birmingham North LLC, InTown Suites Management Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Glynn v. Conway et al
as 5:2013cv02049
Plaintiff:
Pierre Glynn
Defendant:
Cassandra Conway, Kristie Bias, Dewayne Estes and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cineas v. Strange (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00572
Plaintiff:
John Pierre Cineas
Defendant:
Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace v. Hoover, City of et al
as 2:2013cv01230
Plaintiff:
Brandon Pierre Wallace
Defendant:
Hoover, City of, Graves, Andre Brown and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Montgomery City Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00696
Plaintiff:
Romero Pierre Frazier
Defendant:
Montgomery City Jail, Quality Correctional Healthcare, Inc. and Johnney Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
