Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Smith v. Biehler et al
as 4:2021cv00262
Plaintiff:
Pierre Smith
Defendant:
H Haight Biehler, Unknown Bulger, Unknown Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
July v. Penzone et al
as 2:2021cv00402
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Arizona Department of Child Safety and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Pierre July, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
July v. Penzone et al
as 2:2021cv00401
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Arizona Department of Child Safety and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Pierre July, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
July v. Penzone et al
as 2:2021cv00282
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Arizona Department of Child Safety and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Pierre July, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pierre v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00393
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Pierre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Xcentric Ventures LLC v. Epifaniou et al
as 2:2018cv03661
Defendant:
Pierre Zarokian, Joshua Polloso Epifaniou and Unknown Zarokian
Plaintiff:
Xcentric Ventures LLC and Xcentric Ventures LLC doing business as Ripoff Report.com
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Bennett v. Kapoor et al
as 2:2018cv02170
Defendant:
Insys Therapeutics Incorporated, Patrick Fourteau, Michael Babich and others
Plaintiff:
David Bennett
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Soltau v. Kapoor et al
as 2:2018cv01720
Plaintiff:
Jim Soltau
Defendant:
John N Kapoor , Michael Babich, Darryl S Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lacroze v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03020
Plaintiff:
Pierre J Lacroze
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
