Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Taylor v. Tornichio et al
as 3:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Pierre Rahsaan Taylor
Defendant:
Adolfo Tornichio, Stephen Wolaver, Alan Kraker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Clervrain et al v. Madden et al
as 5:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ronaldo Jean, Brandko, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Madden, Jon Husted, Dave Yost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierre Investments, Inc. v. Fifth Third Bank
as 1:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Pierre Investments, Inc. doing business as Gehard Luxury Homes and Ken Gazian
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank, Ohio Secretary of State, Delaware Secretary of State and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Pierre Investments, Inc. v. Fifth Third Bank
as 2:2021cv05312
Plaintiff:
Pierre Investments, Inc.
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank, Frank LaRose, Jeffrey Bullock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Legare v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00612
Plaintiff:
Pierre P. Legare
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
St. Pierre v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02983
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John St. Pierre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. eBay, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03459
Defendant:
Pierre Omidyar, Pamela Omidyar, eBay, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. USA
as 1:2020cv01223
Petitioner:
Pierre A. Campbell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mays v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02321
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Pierre Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
