Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv60418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2020cv80309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv80651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv61230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DL, et al v. DC, et al
as 16-7076
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DL, Tameka Ford, Parent and Next Friend of D.L., JB and others
Defendant - Appellant:
District of Columbia, A Municipal Corporation, Kaya Henderson, Chancellor and Hanseul Kang, District of Columbia State Superintendent of Education
Jackson v. Director of IDOC et al
as 4:2016cv04054
Plaintiff:
Stevie Jackson
Defendant:
Director of IDOC, Kevwe Akpore, Stiles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Joshua M. Crandall, by Marc T. Crandall v. GODINEZ et al
as 1:2014cv01401
Defendant:
S.A. GODINEZ, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC , Shawn M Thrush and others
Plaintiff:
Marc T Crandall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piester v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv10237
Plaintiff:
Molly Piester
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
National Labor Relations Board v. Alton H Piester LLC
as 6:2013cv00717
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Alton H Piester LLC
Garnishee:
ADM Processing Division, Alfonzas Lawn Service Inc, Archer Daniels Midland Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001 Federal Debt Collection Act
National Labor Relations Board v. Piester
as 6:2012mc00406
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
Alton Piester
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
