Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Gibbs v. Utilization Review Committee
as 24-891
Plaintiff:
DAVID GIBBS
Defendant:
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FEDUS, Dr., PILLAI, Dr. and others
Ibbison v. Scagliarni et al
as 3:2023cv01379
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Ibbison
Defendant:
Scagliarni, Swol, Ericson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gojcaj v. Naqvi et al
as 3:2023cv01097
Plaintiff:
Marash Gojcaj
Defendant:
Syed Naqvi, Umprakash Pillai, Francesco Lupis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Gagne et al
as 3:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Gerard G. Gagne, Daniel Yesu, Michelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Machinski et al
as 3:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
Sharlim Marie Rodriguez
Defendant:
Tricia A. Machinski and Ompakash Pillai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez, Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ibbison v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01163
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Ibbison
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Rodriguez, Mr. Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harnage v. Pillai
as 22-1856
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James A. Harnage
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Omprakash Pillai, Lisa Candelario and Robert Bonetti
Defendant:
Dr. Omprekash Pillai, Dr. David Giles, Lisa Caldonero and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
