Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Mavachev et al v. Garcia et al
as 1:2024cv20417
Plaintiff:
Eric Mavachev and Jennifer Shafir
Defendant:
Xandi Garcia, Maybel Sanchez, Mirta Lora and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mavachev et al v. Garcia et al
as 1:2024cv20416
Plaintiff:
Eric Mavachev and Jennifer Shafir
Defendant:
Xandi Garcia, Orielys Sosa-Cabrera, Yennys Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pintado-Vishco v. Garland
as 23-7121
Petitioner:
JUAN PABLO PINTADO-VISHCO, MARIA FERNANDA PALTIN-LOJA and THIAGO JHOSUE PINTADO-PALTIN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. CalderonValcarcel (Parks)
as 22-1306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellee:
James C. Parks and Lavon Parks, AKA Dutch
Defendant:
Felix Calderon-Valcarcel, Annette Lugo Rodriguez, Vivian Pintado-Figueroa and others
Perez Payan v. Garland
as 22-1029
Petitioner:
LIZETTE PEREZ PAYAN and FRANCISCO L PINTADO PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pintado v. Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles
as 2:2022cv00677
Plaintiff:
Roberto A. Pintado
Defendant:
Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SYDNOR v. PINTADO-RIVERA
as 3:2022cv01170
Plaintiff:
TEREZ SYDNOR
Defendant:
DIEGO E PINTADO-RIVERA and DIEGO RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Pintado Marin v. Garland
as 21-6537
Petitioner:
LUIS ALFREDO PINTADO MARIN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mauricio Partida Ramos, et al v. William Barr
as 20-73475
Petitioner:
MAURICIO PARTIDA RAMOS and MARGARITA PINTADO BUENO
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
