Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Nessel et al v. Chemguard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00373
Defendant:
Verde Environmental, Inc., Denko, Inc., Rockwood Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Nessel and Michigan, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Nessel et al v. Chemguard, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01080
Defendant:
Vulcan Fire Systems, Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Dawn Chemical Corporation of Wisconsin, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Nessel, State of Michigan and Michigan, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nessel et al v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company et al
as 2:2020cv03307
Defendant:
Rockwood Systems, Inc., Verde Environmental, Inc., Denko, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Nessel and Michigan, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Nessel et al v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company et al
as 1:2020cv00787
Defendant:
Hazard Control Technologies, Inc, DowDupont, Inc., Noble Industrial Supply Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
The State of Michigan, Attorney General Dana Nessel, on behalf of the people of the State of Michigan, and the STATE of MICHIGAN, Dana Nessel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Certain Interested Underwriters at LLoyd's, London Subcribing to Policy Certificate No. CLP0320674 v. Pioneer Productions, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv60904
Plaintiff:
Certain Interested Underwriters at LLoyd's, London Subcribing to Policy Certificate No. CLP0320674 and Certain Interested Underwriters at LLoyd's, London Subcribing to Policy Certificate No. CLP0320674
Defendant:
Pioneer Productions, Inc. and Michael Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Maple Flooring Manufacturers Association, Inc. v. Pioneer Products, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00274
Plaintiff:
Maple Flooring Manufacturers Association, Inc.
Defendant:
Pioneer Products, Inc. and Alvin Stalford
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
