Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
United States v. Pacheco, et al
as 24-1114
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MANUEL PACHECO and EZEQUIEL PITA-CHAVOLLA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Doe v. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Inc, Wyndham Hotel Group, LLC, Super 8 Worldwide, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1514 Civil Action to Restrain Harassment of a Victim
Li et al v. CITY OF CHICAGO et al
as 1:2023cv15485
Plaintiff:
Dongping Li, Xiaozhen Mai, Patrick McGuire and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Mayor Brandon Johnson, Commissioner Matthew Beaudet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mamo v. LI Pita House Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv07582
Plaintiff:
Bilal Mamo
Defendant:
LI PITA HOUSE INC. and Cafer Sahin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
U.S. Department of Labor v. Domingos 54 Construction, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv02123
Plaintiff:
U.S. Department of Labor
Defendant:
Domingos 54 Construction, Inc. and Manuel Domingos Pita
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 660 Action by Sec Labor for discrimination re rights OSHA
Morales Pita v. Garland
as 23-2030
Petitioner:
ISSAC MORALES PITA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Guzman v. Tulcingo Deli VI Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv02580
Defendant:
Dong Mei Liu, Alicia Pita, Tulcingo Deli VI Corp. doing business as Tulcingo and others
Plaintiff:
Ofelia Guzman
Vasquez et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Lessly Vasquez and Uriel Pita Garcia
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
