Cases 1 - 10 of 44
PITTMAN v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
STEVEN PITTMAN, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pittman v. USA
as 2:2023cv02192
Petitioner:
Izell L Pittman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hoskins v. Pittman et al
as 1:2023cv03074
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Defendant:
Pittman and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Groth et al
as 1:2022cv04195
Plaintiff:
Jason M Jones
Defendant:
Kathaleen T Groth, Stephen J Connolly, Kathleen Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dibble v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01427
Plaintiff:
Terry Dibble
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Carissa Luking, Lorie Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zepeda v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv01386
Plaintiff:
Francisco Zepeda
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Dee Dee Brookhart, Lori Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Small v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv01585
Plaintiff:
Dante Small
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Source, Lawrence Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powelkowski v. Walker
as 3:2021cv00882
Plaintiff:
Leszek Powelkowski
Defendant:
Vicky Walker, Lynn Pittman, Dr. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00762
Defendant:
L. Cunningham, D. Brookhart, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crockett v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2021cv00570
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Srgnt. Stanley, Counselor Tate and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Crockett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
