Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Sister E. Jones-Bey v. Chen
as 22-2953
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sister E. Jones-Bey
Defendant / Appellee:
Pamela K. Chen, Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, on behalf of U.S. Attorney General, Attorney General Letitia James, on behalf of the State of New York and others
Cheikhaoui v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2022cv08855
Plaintiff:
Kamal Cheikhaoui
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Apple, Inc., Omniscient Investigations Corp. d/b/a OIC Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sister E. Jones-Bey v. Chen
as 21-2495
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sister E. Jones-Bey
Defendant / Appellee:
Pamela K. Chen, Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, on behalf of U.S. Attorney General, Attorney General Letitia James, on behalf of the State of New York and others
Sister E. Jones-Bey v. Chen et al
as 1:2021cv06142
Plaintiff:
Sister E. Jones-Bey
Defendant:
Pamela K. Chen, Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Merola v. Lowe et al
as 2:2020cv00491
Defendant:
Automobile Club of America, Nassau Health Care Corporation, NuHealth and others
Plaintiff:
Cathy Merola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ross v. Village of Burnham et al
as 1:2012cv09234
Plaintiff:
John Ross
Defendant:
Village of Burnham, City of Calumet City, City of Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vickers v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv04031
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Russell Fertik and New York City Police Department
Plaintiff:
Gary Vickers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PATTERSON v. INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE OFFICER RUSSELL BURNS et al
as 1:2008cv00525
Plaintiff:
KEVIN PATTERSON and KEVIN PATTERSON
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE OFFICER RUSSELL BURNS, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
