Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Oi Lam Poon v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv02888
Plaintiff:
Oi Lam Poon
Defendant:
Secretary of DHS Alexandar Mayorkas, US Attorney General MERRICK GARLAND, ROSEMARY LANGLEY MELVILLE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Poon-Atkins et al v. Poon et al
as 4:2024cv01345
Plaintiff:
Christy Poon-Atkins, Rhonda Barnette, Kesha Poon and others
Defendant:
John Poon and David Poon
Phat Van Chan et al v. Rolando F. Canobbio
as 2:2023cv04442
Plaintiff:
Phat Van Chan and Lai Fan Poon Chan
Defendant:
Rolando F. Canobbio
Rushing et al v. Kochava, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00322
Plaintiff:
Amanda Rushing, Ashley Supernault, Julie Remold and others
Defendant:
Kochava, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01737
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Percival v. Poon
as 2:2020cv01040
Defendant:
Laina Poon
Plaintiff:
Ina Percival
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2701
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2020cv01039
Plaintiff:
Laina Poon and Ina Percival
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2701
Exponent Private Equity LLP et al v. Exponent Venture Management Company, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv03865
Defendant:
Wing-Hei Wilkins Chung, Euwyn Poon, Exponent Venture Management Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Exponent Private Equity LLP and Exponent Private Equity (Holdings) LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Gowadia v. Internal Revenue Service; et al.
as 1:2019cv00090
Defendant:
Susan Mitsuyoshi, Internal Revenue Service, Florence Poon and others
Plaintiff:
Noshir S. Gowadia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karen Stromberg, et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 19-15159
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAYAN CRUTCHER, JEFFREY DAVIS, DAVID KOPLOVITZ and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN HART, MICHELLE MACKAY, GAIL MARGOLIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
