Cases 21 - 30 of 107
Perez et al v. Way Fong LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01984
Plaintiff:
Julio Guaman, Jose Guaman and Gerardo Perez
Defendant:
Wally Poon, Way Fong LLC, Way Fong Holding Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Latimore v. Poon
as 21-1233
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Correctional Staff, DAVID CLANCY, MCI Norfolk, WILLIAM J. GROSSI, Director of Security, MCI Norfolk and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON K. LATIMORE
Defendant / Appellee:
VINCENT POON, MCI Norfolk
LALOR v. LOWREY et al
as 2:2020cv16231
Defendant:
MICHAEL TODMAN, ROBERT M. FALZON, KENNETH Y. TANJI and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LALOR
LALOR v. LOWREY et al
as 2:2020cv16092
Defendant:
KARL J KRAPEK, ROBERT M. FALZON, MICHAEL TODMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LALOR
Moulay Tidriri v. Board of Regents, et al
as 20-3265
Defendant / Appellee:
Zhijun Wu, Howard Levine, Roger Maddux and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Moulay Tidriri
Moulay Tidriri v. Board of Regents, et al
as 20-3240
Defendant / Appellee:
Zhijun Wu, Howard Levine, Jennifer Davidson, also known as Newman and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Moulay Tidriri
Poon v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05148
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Darrin Poon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Negrete v. Poons Liquors, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04454
Defendant:
Poons Liquors, Inc., Surinder Sahni, Hipolito Avila and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Negrete
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
PEKIN POLICE PENSION FUND v. LOWREY et al
as 2:2020cv12772
Defendant:
MARTINA HUND-MEJEAN, ROBERT M. FALZON, KENNETH Y. TANJI and others
Plaintiff:
PEKIN POLICE PENSION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Molori Energy Inc v. Sands et al
as 3:2020cv02865
Defendant:
RNP, LLC, LRG Energy LLC, Richard Sands and others
Plaintiff:
Molori Energy, Inc. and Molori Energy Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
