Cases 1 - 10 of 74
United States of America v. Porter
as 0:2024cv01497
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Walter Porter
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Miles v. Johnston et al
as 0:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
Gordon Miles
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Nancy Stacken, Courtney Menton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Minnesota Deer Farmers Association et al v. State of Minnesota, The et al
as 0:2023cv03907
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Deer Farmers Association, Aaron Seitz, Allen Huju and others
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, The, Sarah Strommen, Erica Sawatzke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Porter et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03412
Plaintiff:
Olen Porter and Karen Porter
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Porter et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03387
Plaintiff:
Wayne Porter and Angel Porter
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
In re Rule 45 Subpoena Issued to Don Porter dated February 10, 2023
as 0:2023mc00042
Plaintiff:
Don Porter
Defendant:
Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs Beef Steering Committee
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Porter v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv01114
Plaintiff:
Willie Porter
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Porter v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00918
Plaintiff:
Brian Porter
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Porter v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv02447
Plaintiff:
Angela Porter
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Everest Stables, Inc. et al v. Porter, Wright, Morris, & Arthur LLP et al
as 0:2021cv02289
Plaintiff:
Everest Stables Inc, Jeffrey Nielsen and Everest Stables, Inc.
Defendant:
Porter, Wright, Morris, & Arthur LLP and Christopher D. Cathey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
