Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Helton v. Duffield Regional Jail Post Office
as 7:2020cv00641
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Helton
Defendant:
Duffield Regional Jail Post Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nails v. Coat et al
as 1:2015cv00789
Plaintiff:
Angela Nails
Defendant:
Cindy Coat, United States Post Office and Grandview Missouri Post Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bates v. United States Post Office
as 3:2014cv00781
Plaintiff:
Hephzibah Bates
Defendant:
United States Post Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barbour v. All Judicial Function Persons of Post Office Box 8537 to the United States District Courts Under Missoula, Montana Federal Authority, et al
as 7:2011cv00539
Defendant:
All Judicial Function Persons of Post Office Box 8537 to the United States District Courts Under Missoula, Montana Federal Authority, et al
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willoughby v. Johnson et al
as 3:2010cv00330
Plaintiff:
Mike M. Willoughby
Defendant:
Gene Johnson, David Robinson, George Hinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. West Springfield Post Office
as 1:2009cv00816
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Young
Defendant:
West Springfield Post Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Shelton v. United States Post Office et al
as 3:2008cv00399
Plaintiff:
John Shelton
Defendant:
United States Post Office, Employee One/ John Doe I and Employee Two/John Doe II
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Shelton v. United States Post Office et al
as 3:2007cv00178
Plaintiff:
John B. Shelton
Defendant:
United States Post Office, John Doe I and John Doe II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
