Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Green v. Barnett et al
as 7:2026cv05504
Plaintiff:
Antwan Green
Defendant:
Winston Barnett, Jr., Jason Ayala and Michael Powe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris, et al v. United States of America
as 1:2026cv00184
Plaintiff:
Sharon D. Fails, Tyrance Harris, Holly Powe and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Powe v. Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv06140
Plaintiff:
Cindy Powe
Defendant:
Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., L'Oreal USA, Inc.,, L'Oreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Powe v. Shin
as 26-60285
Plaintiff:
Deborah Powe
Defendant:
Lana Ah-Young Shin and Hertz Corporation
Andrew Barrie Collection LLC v. United States et al
as 1:2026cv02746
Defendant:
United States, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Rodney S. Scott, in his official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barrie Collection LLC doing business as Pow Wow Products
Corsica Lambert, et al v. Mobile County Commissioners, et al
as 26-10996
Plaintiff:
CORSICA LAMBERT, BRITTNAY POWE and JASON NAPIER
Defendant:
MOBILE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, SHERIFF, MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA, JONATHAN RIVERS and others
Pow v. Armellini Industries Inc.
as 26-146
Plaintiff:
CHRIS POW and MADELAINE VALDEZ
Defendant:
ARMELLINI INDUSTRIES INC. and JASSEN LOISEAU
Pow v. Armellini Industries Inc.
as 26-131
Plaintiff:
CHRIS POW and MADELAINE VALDEZ
Defendant:
ARMELLINI INDUSTRIES INC. and JASSEN LOISEAU
Powe v. Brooks et al.
as 1:2025cv06665
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Powe
Defendant:
Latoya Brooks and DNF Partners LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Michael Driggs v. CIA
as 25-2177
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DRIGGS, ROBERT MOORE, JANA OREAR and others
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
