Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Mourey et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00764
Plaintiff:
Tracey Mourey, Kenneth Mourey, Jr., Levi Murphy and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
PRAY et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv08115
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PRAY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRAY v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv03809
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and MERCK & CO. INC.
Plaintiff:
TINA PRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv02962
Plaintiff:
JAMES PRAY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Maurice Clark, Sr., et al v. Borough of Colwyn, et al
as 15-3439
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MAURICE J. CLARK, SR.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
POLICE OFFICER KEVIN E. BANKS, SR., POLICE OFFICER BRYANT K. STERLING, POLICE OFFICER CLINTON CRADDOCK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BOROUGH OF COLWYN, WENDELL REED, Deputy Chief, Colwyn Borough Police Department, TREVOR PARHAM, Corporal, Colwyn Borough Police Department and others
PRAY v. DRUCTOR et al
as 2:2015cv05510
Plaintiff:
TONETTE PRAY
Defendant:
MICHAEL DRUCTOR and BRIAN HILLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMIREZ v. FONSECA et al
as 3:2014cv07985
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL RAMIREZ
Defendant:
JOSE A. FONSECA and W.E. PRAY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMIREZ et al v. FONSECA et al
as 3:2014cv07512
Plaintiff:
JOSE RAMIREZ
Defendant:
JOSE A. FONSECA and W.E. PRAY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
