Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Singh v. Blanche
as 26-2579
Petitioner:
KARAN PREET SINGH
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Doe (R.N.H.) v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc., et al.
as 4:2026cv07107
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Wyndham Hotel & Resorts, Inc., Days Inns Worldwide Inc, Om Krupa Maa LLC and others
Cross-Complainant:
S & S Investment Enterprises, LLC
Cross-Defendant:
Om Krupa Maa LLC, Preet Hospitality Inc., Days Inns Worldwide Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Preet v. Blanche
as 26-2374
Petitioner:
SHUBIH PREET
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kadakia v. Yad&Pre LLC et al
as 1:2026cv00749
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kadakia
Defendant:
Yad&Pre LLC, Dasuleen LLC, Dasia LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05140
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wallace v. New York Police Department
as 26-1480
Plaintiff:
TIMMY WALLACE
Defendant:
HASKOVIC HARRIS, Police Officer, MICHAEL MONAHAN, Police Officer, ALEJANDRO AZCONA, Police Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02548
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00798
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bowens v. Singh et al
as 4:2026cv02196
Plaintiff:
JARON BOWENS
Defendant:
GURWINDER SINGH and PREET BAJWA INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
