Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05142
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05145
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01820
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00138
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Tajinder Singh v. Merrick B. Garland
as 21-2072
Petitioner: TAJINDER PREET SINGH
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Charan Singh v. William Barr
as 20-73456
Petitioner: CHARAN PREET SINGH
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Harman Singh v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60098
Petitioner: HARMAN PREET SINGH
Respondent: MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, ACTING U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Charnjit Singh, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-60821
Petitioner: CHARNJIT SINGH, MANJEET KAUR, KRISHAN PREET SINGH and others
Respondent: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
BMO Harris Bank N.A. vs. CHD Transport, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00625
Plaintiff: BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant: CHD Transport, Inc., Gagan Preet Singh and Gurinder Singh
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
BMO Harris Bank N..A. v. CHD Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2017at00361
Plaintiff: BMO Harris Bank N..A.
Defendant: CHD Transport, Inc., Gagan Preet Singh, Gaganpreet Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?