Cases
Elyas v. Prince William Manassas Adult Detention Center
as 1:2023cv01314
Plaintiff: Sameer Elyas
Defendant: Prince William Manassas Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerry Welty, Jr. v. Peter Meletis
as 19-7050
Defendant: AMANDA LAMBERT, Director of Support Services, AUSTIN B. HAYNES, JR., Citizen at Large, PHILLIP CAMPBELL, Assistant fo the County Executive and others
Defendant / Appellee: GEORGE HURLOCK, Director of Security, GLENDELL HILL, Chairman and PETER MELETIS, Superintendent
Plaintiff / Appellant: JERRY WELTY, JR.
Akil Bey v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 14-2143
Petitioner - Appellant: AKIL RASHIDI BEY, ex rel. Akido Graves
Respondent - Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and PRINCE WILLIAM-MANASSAS ADULT DETENTION CENTER
Lewis v. Prince William County Manassas Regional Adult Detention et al
as 1:2014cv00320
Plaintiff: Ronell Scott Lewis
Defendant: Prince William County Manassas Regional Adult Detention and Prince William - Manassas Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akil Bey v. Commonwealth of Virginia We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-7759
Petitioner - Appellant: AKIL RASHIDI BEY, ex rel. Akido Graves
Respondent - Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and PRINCE WILLIAM-MANASSAS ADULT DETENTION CENTER
Bey v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2013cv01001
Petitioner: Akil Rashidi Bey
Respondent: Commonwealth of Virginia and Prince William-Manassas Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arrington v. Prince William Manassas Adult Detention Center Classification Committee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00750
Plaintiff: Jerome Arrington
Defendant: Prince William Manassas Adult Detention Center Classification Committee, Zentz, Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?