Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Widi v. McNeil, et al
as 19-1241
Defendant / Appellee: LIEUTENANT KEVIN CADY, ELIOT POLICE DEPARTMENT, SA STEPHEN E. HICKEY, JR. and others
Defendant: OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY, US ATTORNEYS OFFICE, US BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES and others
Interested Party: TRAVIS WEBBER
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Rosario v. Rhode Island Department of Correction et al
as 1:2015cv14055
Plaintiff: Evaristo Rosario
Defendant: Rhode Island Department of Correction, Rhode Island Adult Probation and Parole and Rhode Island Judiciary and State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Andrew Flood v. ME Department of Correction, et al
as 13-1064
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANDREW P. FLOOD
Defendant - Appellee: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WILLIAM LOVE, CHARLES O'ROAK and others
Defendant: JOSEPH PONTE and ME DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Interested Party: UNITED STATES
FLOOD v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00270
Plaintiff: ANDREW P FLOOD
Defendant: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSEPH PONTE, JOHN DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tilley v. Kiefer, et al
as 11-1748
Defendant - Appellant: RONALD E. TILLEY
Defendant - Appellee: CANDIS KEEFER, ERIC LAGGASSE, DOUG SMITH and others
Peno v. Varano et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011fp00242
Respondent: Lawrence F. Clark, Jr., Department of Corrections, PA Attorney General and others
Petitioner: Kevin Paul Peno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
FLOOD v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2011cv00205
Plaintiff: ANDREW P FLOOD
Defendant: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSEPH PONTE, PROBATION AND PAROLE, ME DEPT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?