Cases 1 - 10 of 33
MAHARAJ v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 0:2022cv62043
Plaintiff:
NEERA MAHARAJ
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Eagan et al v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv02348
Plaintiff:
John Eagan, II, Enyiazubuike Ehiemere, Mark Farrell and others
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Palmer v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv01470
Plaintiff:
Ryan Palmer
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Redhair v. Progressive Casualty Ins. Co.
as 2:2021cv00947
Plaintiff:
Brian R. Redhair
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Heemer v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2021cv00605
Plaintiff:
Corey Heemer
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Harker v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2020cv02078
Plaintiff:
Michael Harker
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Williams v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 6:2020cv00695
Plaintiff:
Dana Williams
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Rosario v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 6:2020cv00352
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Arlene Rosario and Geanene Silas
Upchurch v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2019at00714
Plaintiff:
Latoya Upchurch
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 25, Inclusive and Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Upchurch v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2019cv01526
Plaintiff:
Latoya Upchurch
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
