Cases
Cases 31 - 37 of 37
GIBSON v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01038
Plaintiff: THOMAS G. GIBSON
Defendant: PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
DIGIOIA et al v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO. et al
as 2:2014cv00385
Plaintiff: ANTHONY M. DIGIOIA and CATHLEEN DIGIOIA
Defendant: PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO. and PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
JOHNSON v. PROGRESSIVE DRIVE INSURANCE et al
as 2:2012cv02632
Plaintiff: OCTAVIA JOHNSON
Defendant: PROGRESSIVE DRIVE INSURANCE, PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nighswander v. Baldwin, et al.
as 3:2012cv00433
Petitioner: Scott Nighswander
Claimant: Donald G. Baldwin , Paramount Care, Inc. and Progressive Specialty Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Williams v. Martinez et al
as 2:2011cv00828
Plaintiff: Jenetrice Williams
Defendant: Santiago Ima Martinez , Smith Cartage, Inc. and GEICO General Insurance Company
Counter_claimant: Santiago Ima Martinez and Sonia Ima
Counter_defendant: Jenetrice Williams
Thirdparty_defendant: Harrison Spencer and Progressive Specialty Insurance Co.
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Sonia Ima and Santiago Ima Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Okakok v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co. et al
as 2:2010cv00002
Plaintiff: Rex Okakok
Defendant: Progressive Specialty Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Insurance
Littlefield v. Concord General Mutual Insurance Co. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00007
Plaintiff: Laurie Littlefield
Defendant: Concord General Mutual Insurance Co. and Progressive Specialty Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?