Cases filed in Connecticut
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Quigley v. Burrow et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01182
Plaintiff: Jay Quigley
Defendant: Burrow, Velez and Santiago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Fleischman et al
as 3:2022cv00530
Plaintiff: Manetirony Clervrain, Shakira Sherlandy Joseph and Manetiony Clervrain
Defendant: Jeff Fleischman, Sandy Coppola, Robert White, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quigley v. Williams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01158
Plaintiff: Jay Quigley
Defendant: Williams, Daniels, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quigley v. Rivera et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00482
Defendant: La Mountain, Sholz, Behm and others
Plaintiff: Jay Quigley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brodeur v. Champion et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01738
Plaintiff: Paul Brodeur
Defendant: Champion, Terranova, Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Forbes et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00613
Plaintiff: Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant: Scarlett Forbes, Mark Frayne, Waldron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davila v. Quigley et al
as 3:2015cv00119
Plaintiff: Noel Davila
Defendant: Quigley, Piluso, Messier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01109
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01110
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Subway Intl, BV v. Quigley
as 3:2008cv01689
Plaintiff: Subway Intl, BV
Defendant: Russell P. Quigley
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?