Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Quigley et al v. ConocoPhillips Company et al
as 4:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
John E Quigley and Frances Quigley
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company, The Conocophillips Company Benefits Committee and John/ Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Quigley v. Gamez et al
as 5:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
Zachary Quigley
Defendant:
FNU Gamez and Lubbock County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bravo et al v. Pelosi et al
as 6:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Bravo, P. P., Lindsey Nguyen and others
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg, Mike Podhorzer, Pete Sessions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quigley v. The Kroger Co et al
as 4:2016cv00921
Plaintiff:
Sheila Quigley
Defendant:
The Kroger Co and Schur Star Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quigley v. DCT Pinnacle II LLC et al
as 3:2016cv03282
Plaintiff:
Paul Quigley
Defendant:
DCT Pinnacle II LLC , Air Vent Inc and Iron Mountain Information Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Quigley v. The Kroger Co et al
as 3:2016cv02484
Plaintiff:
Sheila Quigley
Defendant:
The Kroger Co and Schur Star Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Macias-Ochoa v. Mendez et al
as 5:2016cv00108
Plaintiff:
Abraham Macias-Ochoa
Defendant:
Manuel Mendez, NFN Hernandez, Kate Quigley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quigley v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2016cv00459
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Michael Quigley
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00499
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
