Cases 41 - 50 of 103
Quintez Talley v. PA Department of Corrections, et al
as 20-1278
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Quintez Talley v. Jerry Sandusky, et al
as 20-1118
Defendant / Appellee:
C.O. GERBER, JERRY SANDUSKY, HEX YODIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Quintez Talley v. Pushkalai Pillai, et al
as 20-1013
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. MORRIS, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CAPTAIN SHREDDER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Quintez Talley v. PA. Department of Corrections, et al
as 19-4005
Defendant / Appellee:
R. DOYLE, UNKNOWN EXTRACTION TEAM 1, RN CHRIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Quintez Talley v. Major Clark, et al
as 19-3797
Defendant / Appellee:
MAJOR CLARK, Major, UNKNOWN CORRECTION OFFICERS, DR. RICHARD DOYLE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Quintez Talley v. Gilmore, et al
as 19-3776
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT GILMORE, ANKRAM and COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Quintez Talley v. Griesmer, et al
as 19-3796
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. KULL, Lieutenant, JOHN E. WETZEL, WOODWARD, Correction Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Quintez Talley, et al v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, et al
as 19-3581
Defendant / Appellee:
HARRISBURG REGIONAL LABORATORY, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY CENTRE COUNTY, J. MICHAEL WILLIAMSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MINORITIES OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIANS WITH MENTAL ILLNESS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
TALLEY v. SANDUSKY et al
as 3:2019cv00183
Defendant:
ANY/ALL JOHN AND JANE DOES, JOHN WETZEL, C.O. GERBER and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TALLEY v. CAPOZZA
as 3:2019cv01792
Petitioner:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Mark Capozza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
