Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
LIANG v. TENAFLY GOOD TASTE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
JUN LIANG
Defendant:
TENAFLY GOOD TASTE LLC doing business as GOOD TASTE CHINESE TAKE-OUT, QIAO ZHANG, BI JUAN SHI and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00128
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Strabala v. Zhang et al
as 1:2015cv01228
Plaintiff:
Jay Marshall Strabala
Defendant:
Qiao Zhang and Zhou Shimiao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
CHEN v. ZHANG et al
as 2:2010cv06255
Plaintiff:
CHONG CHEN
Defendant:
SHAN QIAO ZHANG, ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and ERIE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cross_claimant:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cross_defendant:
ERIE INSURANCE COMPANY and SHAN QIAO ZHANG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Qiao Zhang v. Emilio T Gonzalez et al
as 2:2007cv07507
Plaintiff:
Qiao Zhang
Defendant:
Emillo T Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and Robert S Mueller
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Denial of Application for Naturalization Hearing
Zhang v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv00511
Petitioner:
Xiu Qiao Zhang
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Christopher Shanahan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Zhang v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv01188
Plaintiff:
Qiao Zhang
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:1996cv08229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
