Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Crenshaw et al v. Quality Resources, Inc.
as 8:2018cv01143
Plaintiff:
Christopher Crenshaw , Nangwaya Kimbrough , Azra Alijagic and others
Defendant:
Quality Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2102
Quality Resources, Inc., et al v. Sarah Toney
as 17-8017
Petitioner:
QUALITY RESOURCES, INC. and CHERYL MERCURIS
Respondent:
SARAH TONEY
Pierluca et al v. Quality Resources, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv01580
Plaintiff:
Mario Pierluca and Marcus Holmes
Defendant:
Quality Resources, Inc. and Cheryl R. Mercuris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2102
LaCroix v. Quality Resources Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv01516
Plaintiff:
Ricardo R. LaCroix
Defendant:
Quality Resources Inc., State of Florida and Personal Enrichment through Mental Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaCroix v. Quality Resources, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv01515
Plaintiff:
Ricardo R. LaCroix
Defendant:
Quality Resources, Inc., Personal Enrichment through Mental Health Services and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Trilegiant Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00989
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Trilegiant Corporation , Quality Resources, Inc., Loyalty Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on use of telephone equipment
Quality Resources, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 15-1444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Quality Resources, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Pfizer, Inc.
Goetz v. Quality Resources, Inc.
as 5:2014cv01099
Plaintiff:
Chad R. Goetz
Defendant:
Quality Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Quality Resources, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc.
as 4:2014cv01149
Plaintiff:
Quality Resources, Inc.
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mix v. Quality Resources, Inc.
as 8:2014cv00199
Plaintiff:
Corey Mix
Defendant:
Quality Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
