Cases 41 - 50 of 121
Quicken Loans Inc v. Donovan et al
as 4:2017cv02345
Plaintiff:
Quicken Loans Inc
Defendant:
Colin Donovan, Island Green East Homeowners Association Inc and Southbury Homeowners Association Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quicken Loans Inc v. Pierce et al
as 4:2017cv02290
Plaintiff:
Quicken Loans Inc
Defendant:
Shelia Pierce, Carolina Trust Federal Credit Union and Farmington Property Owners' Association Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quicken Loans Inc v. Porter et al
as 3:2017cv02284
Plaintiff:
Quicken Loans Inc
Defendant:
Adrianne Porter and Lansdowne Homeowners Association Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Quicken Loans Inc v. Trizzino
as 8:2017cv02154
Plaintiff:
Quicken Loans Inc
Defendant:
Joseph Trizzino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Quicken Loans Inc v. Acharya et al
as 0:2017cv02043
Plaintiff:
Quicken Loans Inc
Defendant:
Bhavin Acharya, South Carolina Department of Revenue, the , River Hills Bluff Villas Condominium Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Quicken Loans Inc. v. Mckee et al
as 0:2017cv02021
Plaintiff:
Quicken Loans Inc.
Defendant:
Tonika Mckee, Samuel H. Mckee and Pineview at Sherry Acres Homeowners Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Bank National Association v. DeCesare, et al
as 1:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
John DeCesare, Rita DeCesare, Quicken Loans, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlos V. Farias v. Quicken Loans, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00524
Defendant:
Does and Quicken Loans, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carlos V. Farias
Farias v. Quicken Loans, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01504
Plaintiff:
Carlos V. Farias
Defendant:
Quicken Loans, Inc. and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quicken Loans, Inc. v. Gilo et al
as 1:2016cv00634
Plaintiff:
Quicken Loans, Inc.
Defendant:
Victoria J. Gilo and Mary E. Stafford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
