Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Hampton v. Campbell et al
as 5:2024ct03073
Plaintiff: Michael Quincy Hampton
Defendant: Sgt. Campbell, Corporal Kraft, Corporal Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02250
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Sapp v. Matthews Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00411
Plaintiff: Alton Sharan Sapp
Defendant: Matthews Police Department, Town of Matthews, NC, Clark A. Pennington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Pichai et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00228
Defendant: Arthur Cohen, Francesco De Ferrari, Phil Gross and others
Plaintiff: Andre Antonio Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Wright et al
as 5:2020ct03131
Plaintiff: Maurice Quincy Deshawn Williams
Defendant: John Flamion, Romuald Lankosz, Douglas Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Moore et al
as 5:2019ct03292
Defendant: C/O Brooks, Cpt. Moore, Lt. Moore and others
Plaintiff: Quincy Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. USA
as 5:2019cv00317
Petitioner: Quincy Andre Jones
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
James v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00503
Plaintiff: Quincy James
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
James v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv00176
Plaintiff: QUINCY JAMES
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Jackson v. Johnson et al
as 5:2018ct03197
Defendant: C. Johnson, J. Hawkins and Kenneth E. Lassiter
Plaintiff: Quincy Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?