Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Slottke v. State of Wisconsin Department of Industry Labor and Human Relations et al
as 2:2016cv01392
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Slottke, Sr
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin Department of Industry Labor and Human Relations, Department of Workforce Development, Thomas R Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Linton v. Godinez et al
as 3:2016cv00492
Plaintiff:
Titus Linton
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Jesse Montgomery, Pronger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jellis v. Harrington et al
as 3:2015cv00630
Plaintiff:
Jerry Jellis
Defendant:
R Harrington, Lt. Tourville, R Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyons et al v. Harrington et al
as 3:2015cv03139
Plaintiff:
Gary W Lyons and Elaine Griffing Pate
Defendant:
Glen R Harrington, Michael Mitchell, City of Litchfield, IL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Harris v. Butler et al
as 3:2014cv00498
Defendant:
Kim Butler, R Harrington, Sandra Funk and others
Plaintiff:
Larry G Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Harrington et al
as 3:2013cv01300
Plaintiff:
Craig A Jackson
Defendant:
R Harrington, A Godinez, Lemke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santana v. Kempfer et al
as 3:2013cv01229
Plaintiff:
Juan Santana
Defendant:
J Kempfer, R Harrington, T Veath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Purcell v. Harrington
as 3:2013cv50366
Petitioner:
Willard Purcell
Respondent:
R. Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perry v. Harrington et al
as 1:2013cv04650
Petitioner:
Cordell Perry
Respondent:
R. Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Slack v. Harrington et al
as 1:2013cv03020
Plaintiff:
Larry Jerome Slack
Defendant:
R. Harrington and Lisa Madigon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
