Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Keith Washington v. Minnesota DOC, et al
as 24-1962
Plaintiff:
Keith Eugene Washington, also known as Monroe Bernard Washington
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, Supervisor Officials, sued in their individual capacities, MCF Oak Park Heights, MCF Stillwater and others
Hills v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Sharee R. Hills
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hill v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00958
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Hill
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Nathan Braun v. Gov. Tim Walz, et al
as 21-2952
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nathan Christopher Braun
Defendant / Appellee:
Tim Walz, Governor, Commission of Corrections, Nate Knutson, Assistant Commissioner and others
Hussein Yousif v. Travis Knaele, et al
as 21-1771
Defendant / Appellee:
Travis Knaele, Kim R. Hill and MidAmerican Energy Company
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hussein Yousif and Hussein S. Yousif, I
Nathan Braun v. Tim Walz, Governor, et al
as 20-2338
Defendant / Appellee:
Commission of Corrections, Byron Matthews, Captain of Oak Park Heights, Lt. Jason R. Hills, Mail Room Supervisor of Oak Park Heights and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nathan Christopher Braun
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00119
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Braun v. Walz et al
as 0:2020cv00333
Defendant:
Chris Pawelk, Commission of Corrections, Tim Walz and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Christopher Braun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv06081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hill v. CIGNA Group Insurance
as 4:2014cv00535
Plaintiff:
John R Hill
Defendant:
CIGNA Group Insurance
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
