Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Huot v. Montana State Department of Child & Family Services et al
as 1:2017fp00314
Defendant:
Cal Boyal, Susanne M. Clague, Susan Day and others
Plaintiff:
Safron Huot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HUOT v. MONTANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES et al
as 1:2017cv00263
Plaintiff:
SAFRON HUOT
Defendant:
MONTANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES, MONTANA SUPREME COURT, DEER LODGE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. NH State Prison, Warden
as 1:2016cv00462
Petitioner:
Christopher R. Martin
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
NH State Prison, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Landry
as 15-1610
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER R. MARTIN
Respondent - Appellee:
SCOTT LANDRY
MARTIN v. LANDRY
as 2:2014cv00439
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER R MARTIN
Respondent:
SCOTT LANDRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In Re: Philip R. Martin
as 09-1730
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY and INTERNATIONAL MARINE UNDERWRITERS
Claimant - Appellant:
DONALD SALVUCCI
Petitioner - Appellant:
PHILIP R. MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN YACHT CLUB, INC.
Claimant:
ANTHONY ARNONE and DIANNE ARNONE
Janey, Jr. v. Ferriera et al
as 1:2009cv10726
Plaintiff:
Richard H. Janey, Jr.
Defendant:
Kenneth R. Ferriera, Kenneth R. Ferriera, Michael R. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
In the Matter of the Complaint of Philip R. Martin
as 1:2007cv11079
Petitioner:
In the Matter of the Complaint of Philip R. Martin and In the Matter of the Complaint of Philip R. Martin
Cause Of Action: JS 44 Sec. IV - no matching citation currently in database
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
