Cases 1 - 10 of 11
YAROW
as 5:2022cv04089
Plaintiff:
IN RE: AHMED I. YAROW
Defendant:
JACOB R. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RASHID v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv05947
Defendant:
G. SHAFFER, FRANK B. WILLIAMS, C.O. SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
AMIN A. RASHID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSA v. STEPHENS et al
as 2:2019cv01039
Defendant:
MR. BAGINI, HOMER STEPHENS, MR. MATTHEWS and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ROSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
NORMAN v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ATLANTIC COUNTY et al
as 1:2012cv05250
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE NORMAN
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF ATLANTIC COUNTY, ATLANTIC COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, JACK R. MARTIN, ESQ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURRAY v. LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2009cv01098
Plaintiff:
GLENN ASA MURRAY
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, DICK SHELLENBERGER, MOLLY HENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Murray v. Lancaster County, Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2009cv00200
Plaintiff:
Glenn Asa Murray
Defendant:
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, Dick Shellenberger, Molly Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rogers v. Martines et al
as 1:2008cv02305
Petitioner:
Rickey J. Rogers
Respondent:
R. Martines, Petope and Pigot
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Samuel Bishop v. Quierra Williams, et al
as 08-3086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL B. BISHOP, Iman R. Malik
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER FORBES, R. MARTIN, MICHAEL NEWMAN and others
LAFFERTY v. KLEM et al
as 3:2008cv01055
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey W. Lafferty
Defendant:
Edward J. Klem, Jeffery A. Beard, Edward R. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bishop et al v. Williams et al
as 1:2008cv00312
Plaintiff:
Samuel Bishop
Defendant:
Quierra Williams, Michael Newman, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
