Cases 1 - 10 of 194
Daniel Le Clerc, Sr. v. John Guy, et al
as 24-11047
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ALLEN LE CLERC, SR.
Defendant:
JOHN I. GUY and MARK R. MILLER
Timmy Wallace v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-5099
Plaintiff:
TIMMY WALLACE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HECTOR JOYNER, Warden, USP Big Sandy, R. MILLER, Correctional Officer, United States Penitentiary Big Sandy and others
Le Clerc v. Guy et al
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen Le Clerc, Sr.
Defendant:
John I. Guy and Mark R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sumpter v. Miller et al
as 2:2023cv14378
Plaintiff:
Anteshia Sumpter and Antuashia Sumpter
Defendant:
Michelle R Miller, Hassan Ingram, Kelly Ppifher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00517
Petitioner:
DAVID R MILLER
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. LURA WILLIAMS, DELAWARE COUNTY PRISON
as 2:2023cv03126
Petitioner:
STAMAR R. MILLER
Respondent:
LURA WILLIAMS, DELAWARE COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HARNEY v. HORTH et al
as 2:2023cv00360
Petitioner:
MELVIN WES HARNEY
Respondent:
GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARIES F. MILLER, MIA E. KELSAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Cobb County Adult Detention Center
as 1:2023cv03029
Petitioner:
Demeatrice R. Miller
Respondent:
Cobb County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jerry Smith v. Indiana Parole Board, et al
as 23-1866
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY A. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD, G. HORTH, THOR R. MILLER and others
Miller v. Marietta Police Department Agency
as 1:2023cv01799
Plaintiff:
Demeatrice R. Miller
Defendant:
Marietta Police Department Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
