Cases 1 - 10 of 13
(PC) Wolinski v. Gill et al
as 2:2019cv02369
Defendant:
Gill Gursharn, R. Nava, K. Thao and others
Plaintiff:
Krzysztof F. Wolinski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Wolinski v. Eldridge et al
as 2:2019cv02037
Defendant:
S. DeJesus, P. Linehan, K. Mim and others
Plaintiff:
Krzysztof Wolinski and Krzysztof F. Wolinski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hunter v. Williams et al
as 2:2019cv01101
Defendant:
Gabriel Williams, N. Malakkla, Raul R. Recarey and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Abraham Hernandez et al v. City of Indio et al
as 5:2018cv00562
Defendant:
City of Indio, Does, Sgt. J Hapner and others
Plaintiff:
Wendy Cruz, Estate of Abraham Hernandez, A. H. and others
Estate of Abraham Hernandez et al v. City of Indio et al
as 2:2018cv02230
Defendant:
City of Indio, Does, Sgt. J Hapner and others
Plaintiff:
Wendy Cruz, Estate of Abraham Hernandez, A. H. and others
Wise et al v. EOG Resources, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00973
Plaintiff:
Gerald Arthur Anderson, Ronnie Mack Armstrong, Jr., Micah Cannady and others
Defendant:
EOG Resources, Inc. and EnerSafe, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
NAVAS v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54671
Plaintiff:
PABLO R NAVAS
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
NAVAS et al v. ACANDS INC.
as 2:2011cv39349
Plaintiff:
PABLO R NAVAS and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
ACANDS INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
NAVAS et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv39348
Plaintiff:
PABLO R NAVAS and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Signorelli v. Graham County Sheriffs Office et al
as 4:2009cv00546
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Signorelli
Defendant:
Graham County Sheriffs Office, Arizona Department of Corrections, Dora Schriro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
