Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Acosta v. Franklin et al
as 1:2018cv00635
Petitioner:
R. Alexander Acosta
Respondent:
Stephen Franklin, Accurate Optical Company, Inc. and Accurate Optical Company, Inc. 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Acosta v. RPG Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00167
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
RPG Enterprises, LLC, Ryan Gutman and Owen Lawson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Clarendon Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00128
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Clarendon Holdings, LLC, Fairfax Station Holdings, LLC and Vijah Doddi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Jardon & Howard Technologies, Inc., et al
as 4:2018cv00016
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Jardon & Howard Technologies, Inc and Ann Skradski
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
U.S. Department of Labor v. Misivike Contractors, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03460
Plaintiff:
U.S. Department of Labor and R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Misivike Contractors, Inc., Miguel Maliszewski, Keoni Stryhn and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Cambridge Technologies Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01238
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Cambridge Technologies Group, Inc., Andrew Carrington and Cambridge Technologies Group, Inc. 401(K) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Acosta v. Tate et al
as 2:2017cv04183
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Donald Tate, Fas Chek Supermarkets and Fas Chek Employee Medical Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Acosta v. Rudraraju et al
as 1:2017cv01094
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Shah Rudraraju and Softalia, Inc. 401k Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Acosta v. Romero Landscaping, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv02587
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Romero Landscaping, Inc. and Jose Romero
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Tile Restoration, Incorporated
as 4:2017cv00122
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Tile Restoration, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
