Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Pierre et al v. Martin et al
as 3:2023cv01724
Plaintiff:
Macarton N. Pierre, Jane Doe and Yolanda R. Browning
Defendant:
Ian D. Martin, John B. Pike and Brian M. Szumski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOWNIE et al v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv01684
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOSEPH DOWNIE, ARTHUR WHITAKER, JEREMY WINTERS and others
Defendant:
ZAKEN, BUZAS, KAPOLKA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COGLEY v. COUNTY OF BUTLER, et al
as 2:2023cv01152
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. COGLEY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BUTLER, CITY OF BUTLER/CITY POLICE, R. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BROWN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2022cv04000
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA R BROWN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
JUSTICE, II v. VOLT INFORMATION SCIENCES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01250
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D. JUSTICE, II.
Defendant:
VOLT INFORMATION SCIENCES, INC., WILLIAM J GRUBBS, NICK S CYPRUS and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROWN v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2020cv05234
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and BERNADETTE MASON
Petitioner:
YUSUF R. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROSS v. BROWN
as 2:2020cv03457
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ROSS
Defendant:
ALLEN R. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv00512
Defendant:
MELINDA ADAMS, RICHARD COONEY, KAREN FEATHER and others
Plaintiff:
CORDIRO R. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
