Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Adair et al v. Duncan Financial Management, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Robin Adair and Sherrie Adair
Defendant:
Duncan Financial Management, Inc. and Jeffrey R. Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SMITH BEY v. ALSIP et al
as 1:2019cv00750
Defendant:
COOPERIDER, MCKENNY, ROBERT E. CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCES L. SMITH BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Duncan v. Thomas Spiller, et al
as 16-1976
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL R. DUNCAN
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS A. SPILLER, Warden, JEFF MILLER, Officer, ERIC WANGLER, Officer and others
Darryl Duncan v. Thomas Spiller, et al
as 16-1107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL R. DUNCAN
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS A. SPILLER, MICHAEL EDWARDS and CHRISTINE BROWN
Darryl Duncan v. Thomas Spiller, et al
as 15-1783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL R. DUNCAN
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS A. SPILLER, MICHAEL EDWARDS and CHRISTINE BROWN
Darryl Duncan v. Thomas Spiller, et al
as 15-1562
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL R. DUNCAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM SPILLER, OFFICER MILLER, OFFICER WRAGLER and others
Duncan v. Quinn et al
as 3:2015cv00087
Plaintiff:
Darryl R Duncan
Defendant:
Warden Spiller, Officer Miller, Officer Wragler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Quinn et al
as 3:2014cv01167
Plaintiff:
Darryl R Duncan
Defendant:
Thomas Spiller, Edwards and Christine Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Duncan v. Pat Quinn, et al
as 14-2362
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL R. DUNCAN
Defendant - Appellee:
PAT QUINN, Governor of Illinois, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections, PRISONER REVIEW BOARD, ILLINOIS and others
Duncan v. Quin et al
as 3:2014cv00604
Plaintiff:
Darryl R. Duncan
Defendant:
Pat Quin, S.A. Godinez, Prisoner Review Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
