Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant: NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff: Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant: Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
M. A. et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2023cv01843
Plaintiff: M. A., R. S., M. P. and others
Defendant: ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UR JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Deaton et al v. Stephens et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00713
Plaintiff: D Deaton, T Peake, J. K. D. and others
Defendant: Patricia Stephens, Agnes Chappell, Alisha Ruffin May and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pickering-George v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 22-3066
Petitioner: John T. Pickering-George
Respondent: Comissioner of Social Security, Joslyn Carter, AdministratorHead of NYC Department of Homeless Services(DHS), Shemella Lovel, Senior Director - Atlantic House Men's Shelter and others
In re: J. D., et al v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 22-80063
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Respondent: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant: PAX LABS, INC., NU MARK LLC, JAMES MONSEES and others
Petitioner: JUUL LABS, INC.
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
In re: J.D., et al v. Altria Group, Inc., et al
as 22-80061
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Petitioner: ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC and others
Respondent: JUUL LABS, INC., J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning and others
Defendant: GREGORY LEHMAN, TAGGART KNUTSON, PAX LABS, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, et alIn re: Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, et al
as 21-105
Petitioner: In re: LOCKWOOD, ANDREWS & NEWNAM, INC., LOCKWOOD ANDREWS & NEWNAM, PC and LEO A. DALY COMPANY
Respondent: LUKE WAID, Parent and Next-Friend of SR, a minor, et al., MICHELLE RODRIGUEZ, Parent and Next-Friend of SR, a minor, S. R., a minor, by parents and Next-Friends Luke Waid and Michelle Rodriguez and others
Veolia North America, LLC, et alIn re: Veolia North America, LLC, et al
as 21-104
Petitioner: In re: VEOLIA NORTH AMERICA, LLC, VEOLIA WATER NORTH AMERICA OPERATING SERVICES, LLC and VEOLIA NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Respondent: LUKE WAID, Parent and Next-Friend of SR, a minor; et al., MICHELLE RODRIGUEZ, Parent and Next-Friend of SR, a minor, S. R., a minor, by parents and Next-Friends Luke Waid and Michelle Rodriguez and others
Veolia North America, LLC, et alIn re: Veolia North America, LLC, et al
as 21-103
Petitioner: In re: VEOLIA NORTH AMERICA, LLC and VEOLIA NORTH AMERICAN OPERATING SERVICES, LLC
Respondent: LUKE WAID, Parent and Next-Friend of SR, a minor; et al., MICHELLE RODRIGUEZ, Parent and Next-Friend of SR, a minor, S. R., a minor, by parents and Next-Friends Luke Waid and Michelle Rodriguez and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?