Cases 1 - 10 of 10
KING v. USA
as 1:2024cv00289
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD R. KING, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
KING v. VANDERBURG COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 3:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS R. KING
Defendant:
VANDERBURG COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, STOTLER and RYAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDDLE et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
as 1:2018cv03159
Plaintiff:
DAWN RIDDLE and MATT RIDDLE
Defendant:
LYNDSAY KRAUTER, KRISTINA C. HIATT, ELIZABETH DICKERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03764
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
TONI R. KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. King et al
as 1:2017cv00299
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Larry R King, Joanna E King and Roanoke Village Community Association Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
ABDULLAH v. KING (SCOTT)
as 2:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH IBN ABDULLAH
Defendant:
ADDIE R. KING (SCOTT)
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 75 (2) Contract - Reduction in Grade
CAFFEE et al v. KING et al
as 4:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
BROOKE D. CAFFEE, IN and SUSAN HAWKINS, IN
Defendant:
DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, INC., OH and MARTIN R. KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
KING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2011cv01076
Plaintiff:
ALAN R. KING, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
KING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2008cv01710
Petitioner:
ALAN R. KING, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
King v. Mittal Steel USA Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00340
Plaintiff:
John R King
Defendant:
Mittal Steel USA Inc, Mittal Steel USA Inc and Edw C Levy Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
