Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Bonilla v. Freeman et al
as 4:2024cv03010
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Judge Howard R. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Freeman et al
as 4:2024cv02741
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Judge Howard R. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonilla v. Lloyd
as 4:2023cv03446
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Howard R. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. U.S. District Court et al
as 4:2023cv03305
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
U.S. District Court, Beth Labson Freeman, Howard R. Lloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyson v. Country Preferred Insurance Company et al
as 4:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Tanya Tyson
Defendant:
Country Preferred Insurance Company, Amy Hampton, Adrian Delgado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonilla v. Freeman et al
as 4:2022cv03275
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Judge Howard R. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonilla v. Freeman et al
as 4:2022cv02872
Plaintiff:
Steven W. Bonilla
Defendant:
Beth Labson Freeman and Howard R. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacArthur #524290 v. Eaton County 56A District Court et al
as 1:2021cv00775
Plaintiff:
Scott MacArthur #524290
Defendant:
Eaton County 56A District Court, Douglas R. Lloyd and Kelli Wriggelsworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns #302423 v. Schroeder
as 2:2021cv00192
Petitioner:
Zachary Loren Burns #302423
Respondent:
Douglas R. Lloyd and Sarah Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
