Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Knox v. Chambers et al
as 3:2018cv00889
Defendant:
Unknown Porter, Zachary Myrick, S. McCoy and others
Plaintiff:
Byron Joseph Knox
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOODY v. NEWLAND et al
as 1:2018cv05363
Plaintiff:
HAROLD MOODY
Defendant:
R. NEWLAND, MD/CD, CARL SCEUSA, MD/CC, BILL THOMAS, MD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Charles Riddick v. USA, et al
as 18-10709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES RIDDICK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and R. NEWLAND, Physician Assistant, FCC Coleman USP 1
Riddick v. United States of America et al
as 5:2016cv00654
Plaintiff:
Charles P. Riddick
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prison, Tamyra Jarvis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv07834
Plaintiff:
CARL SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DONOVAN TAYLOR, RN, WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray v. Ramos et al
as 5:2015cv00395
Plaintiff:
Charles McCray
Defendant:
Migdalia Ramos, E. Westmoreland, Robert Carver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barnhill v. Duke et al
as 1:2012cv02420
Plaintiff:
Thomas Barnhill, Jr
Defendant:
Dr. Michael Borecky, Terrell Duke, Mr. Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnhill v. Duke et al
as 4:2012cv00004
Plaintiff:
Thomas Barnhill, Jr
Defendant:
Terrell Duke, Rosa Soroya, Michael Borecky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv05308
Plaintiff:
Jobie Banks
Defendant:
Dr. Michael Borecky, M.D., Federal Bureau of Prisons, Peter Elliot Goldstein, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
McDowall v. Cross et al
as 1:2008cv08329
Plaintiff:
Maurice C. McDowall
Defendant:
James Cross, R. Newland, Pamphile and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
