Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Price #925727 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
Jamon Price #925727
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi E. Washington, R. Rewerts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene #958528 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Greene #958528
Defendant:
R. Rewerts, Unknown Walrath, Unknown Petersen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv02268
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
REAGLE, AKILAH LAMAR, MICHAEL A. GRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crumpton #271800 v. Barry County Jail Medical Staff et al
as 1:2022cv01071
Plaintiff:
Michael Delner Crumpton #271800
Defendant:
Barry County Jail Medical Staff, Ronald Drinkert, J. Crisenberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deshone #591224 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2022cv00968
Plaintiff:
Paul Andrew Deshone #591224
Defendant:
R. Rewerts, Unknown Blair and Unknown Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher #669166 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2022cv00671
Plaintiff:
Michael James Fisher #669166
Defendant:
R. Rewerts, K. Nevins, Unknown Wireman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paige #211567 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2020cv01147
Defendant:
Unknown Schiebner, Unknown Shinabarger and R. Rewerts
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Paige #211567
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horacek #218347 v. Lebo et al
as 1:2020cv00995
Defendant:
T. Lebo, R. Rewerts and Kevin J. Weissenborn
Plaintiff:
Daniel Horacek #218347
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diemond #703441 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00473
Defendant:
R. Rewerts, Corizon, J. Niemiec and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Charles Diemond #703441
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
